What two Pokemon types dont have that much very effective?

Question

What Pokemon type has more of not very effective, No effect, Normal effect and the least Very effective?

(Sorry if it is hard to under stand... I don't know a different way to word it.)

Answer 1

You should look at the type chart on this website. It explains much better.

Comments

Type Chart? I know the type coverage checker, but I don't know of a type chart...

---

I found the type chart. Thanks.

Answer 2

I guess you mean what Pokemon type is the least effective in battle?

It'd be Normal type; it's not super-effective against anything, resisted by Steel & Rock, and has no effect against Ghost.

Comments

That is the complete opposite of what I meant...

---

I don't really think my answer warrants a down vote since you didn't explain too properly what you meant. If I interpreted you incorrectly, just say (like you already did), but wtv.

Answer 3

Click for the type chart.

No, I can't understand what you are saying but if it has to do with damage levels, the type chart is there to help you. :D

Comments

This doesn't bring me to a type chart

---

Sorry, my computer's clipboard has been acting up today. That was originally on my clipboard before my attempt of copying the link. >.<